IndabaFoundation
Give
A boy glues paper with a brush at a wooden table.

Evidence and accountability

Every claim, with its source and its limits.

Funders deserve to know what has been measured independently, what comes from our own records, and what is still a plan. This page keeps them apart.

Evidence register

What we know, and how we know it.

Each line carries a mark for the kind of evidence behind it.

  • Independently assessed
  • Documented
  • Indaba records
  • Proposal under discussion
  • Model, not a result
  • 81%

    of 48 children in 15 CoRE-affiliated programmes in Kayamandi on track for their age overall, against 46% of children in early learning programmes nationally.

    ELOM 4&5, independent accredited assessor, June 2026; national figure Thrive by Five Index 2024. A once-off snapshot: it shows where children stood, not what caused it.

    Independently assessed
  • 84% vs 42%

    children aged 50 to 59 months on track overall, against the same age group nationally.

    Same assessment, children aged 50 to 59 months (a subset of the 48), as reproduced from the assessor's report in Indaba's 2026 investment thesis. Gross motor development matched the national figure: 44% vs 44%.

    Independently assessed
  • 7

    modules over seven months, one week a month, so women never leave their jobs to train.

    Programme design (Prospectus 2024). The 2024 Impact Overview describes six modules.

    Documented
  • 5+

    months of mentoring visits to every centre after the last module.

    Programme design (Prospectus 2024). How consistently this happens is not yet reported.

    Documented
  • 500+

    women early childhood teachers trained through CoRE so far, from 500+ centres.

    Indaba management figure, October 2026. Not yet in a published report; completion and retention are not yet reported.

    Indaba records
  • 85,000

    children those teachers will teach over their careers.

    Indaba model: 500 teachers × about 170 children each (the costed plan uses 169 per career). A projection, not a count of children reached.

    Model, not a result
  • 892

    centre improvement visits and 672 hours of mentoring in 2023.

    Indaba Impact Overview 2024.

    Indaba records
  • 5 000+

    children in the care of CoRE-trained practitioners in 2023.

    Indaba estimate (Impact Overview 2024); the method is not stated.

    Indaba records
  • 35

    teachers and principals from 31 centres began Kayamandi 2025 Group 1.

    Summary of the Kayamandi 2025 Group 1 report published by the Indaba Institute. Starting group; completion not yet reported.

    Indaba records
  • 5

    active CoRE facilitators.

    ELOM evidence briefing, June 2026.

    Indaba records
  • 26 → 5

    facilitators targeted for 2024–2026 in April 2024, against five active CoRE facilitators in June 2026. The target was not met; that is why forming facilitators is the first line of the costed plan.

    Impact Overview 2024 (targets); ELOM evidence briefing, June 2026 (active). Delivery totals for 2024–2026 are not yet documented.

    Indaba records
  • ≈70

    teachers a facilitator could train in a year. A planning assumption behind every reach figure on this site; it has not yet been observed.

    Indaba Strategic Investment Thesis, p. 7; Chapter Two Launchpad, p. 11

    Model, not a result
  • 30 · 169

    children per teacher in a year, and over a career. Planning assumptions; lifetime figures count children taught, not unique children.

    Indaba's costed national plan (proposal p. 6)

    Model, not a result
  • ≈US$20

    per child taught over teachers' careers: the costed plan's US$5M divided by about 248 430. A model, not a measured cost. The US$10–30 range shown on the home page is a target.

    Indaba's costed national plan (proposal pp. 6–7)

    Model, not a result
  • 63

    South Africa's Gini index, among the highest measured anywhere. A national figure: no Kayamandi-level measure exists.

    World Bank, World Development Indicators (2014 survey)

    Documented
  • Plan

    A costed three-year national programme has been prepared as a proposal. It is not signed or funded.

    Proposal prepared for partners; planning estimates.

    Proposal under discussion

Figures from 2024 to 2026 are incomplete: totals for those years are still being compiled.

Not yet known

What we cannot show yet.

Saying so is part of being trustworthy. These are the questions we intend future evaluation to answer. No independent evaluation of CoRE has yet been carried out.

  • Completion

    How many finish

    No cohort yet has published enrolment and completion figures side by side.

  • Retention

    Whether practice lasts

    Practice twelve months after training has not yet been measured.

  • Cause

    What the programme caused

    The 2026 assessment was a snapshot without a comparison group; it cannot show cause and effect.

  • Cost

    Cost per graduate

    Costs per teacher in the national plan are planning estimates; observed cost per graduate will be reported once cohorts complete.

An honest gap

What was planned in 2024, and what can be verified in 2026.

April 2024 targets for 2024–2026

  • 52 CoRE programmes
  • 1 820 practitioners trained
  • 45 500 children impacted
  • 60 Facilitators-in-Training
  • 26 facilitators

Verifiable, October 2026

  • 5 active CoRE facilitators (June 2026)
  • Kayamandi Group 1: 35 teachers and principals from 31 centres (2025)
  • 48 children independently assessed across 15 programmes (June 2026)
  • Programme, practitioner and reach totals for 2024–2026: not yet documented

Delivery totals for 2024–2026 are not documented in the sources available to us. They will be added once confirmed from programme records. Until then, the 2024 targets must not be read as achievements.

How we propose to measure

Four numbers every cohort should report.

  1. Completion

    Certified teachers divided by those enrolled at module 1.

  2. Retention

    Teachers still practising twelve months after certification.

  3. Practice quality

    Checklist score at each mentoring visit, tracked over time.

  4. Child outcomes

    ELOM 4&5 at the start and end of a cohort, compared with national data.

How we handle funds and claims

Our commitments to partners.

  1. Restricted gifts stay restricted

    A gift for training, mentoring, facilitators or evidence is used for that purpose.

  2. Proposals are labelled as proposals

    Pipeline, signed, earned and received funds are reported separately, and nothing under discussion is described as agreed.

  3. Every dollar counted once

    Where Indaba's Foundation, Institute and Ventures work together, each contribution is counted by one organisation only.

  4. Results with their limits

    We publish what was measured, by whom and how, including the results that disappoint.

Dignity

We never name a child, and we tell a woman's story only with her consent.

Images are captioned for what they show, and illustrations are labelled as illustrations.

A woman walks along a street holding a small child by the hand.

Scrutiny welcome

Ask us anything about the evidence.

Funders can request the sources behind every figure on this page.